The liability of mimicry: implementing ‘Global HRM standards’ in United States and Indian subsidiaries of a South Korean multinational enterprise

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of RevisedManuscript(F).pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Chung, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-7738, Brewster, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1518 and Bozkurt, Ö. (2020) The liability of mimicry: implementing ‘Global HRM standards’ in United States and Indian subsidiaries of a South Korean multinational enterprise. Human Resource Management, 59 (6). pp. 537-553. ISSN 1099-050X doi: 10.1002/hrm.22011

Abstract/Summary

There is increasing evidence that multinational enterprises (MNEs) from less dominant economies tend to mimic and disseminate HRM practices sourced from a dominant economy, usually the USA, to overcome their ‘liabilities of origin’. However, our understanding of the specific challenges involved in the implementation of such practices by firms across different national and subsidiary contexts remains limited. Drawing on evidence from a case study of a South Korean MNE, we examine the extent and ways in which global HRM policies mimicking US practices are implemented across its sales, manufacturing, and research and development subsidiaries in the USA and India. We find discernible differences in the implementation of the global policies both between the two host country sites and across the three function-specific subsidiaries in each country, identifying a range of national and subsidiary-specific factors that inform these variable implementation outcomes. In addition to legitimacy challenges related to the source, appropriateness, and process of transfer, we note a unique form of legitimacy challenge - ‘the liability of mimicry’ - whereby local actors can challenge head office policies on the basis of a claim to superior expertise in the dominant practices, as a particular concern of MNEs from emerging economies.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/90297
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/hrm.22011
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar