The worst of both worlds: British regional policy 1951-64

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Scott, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-9040 (1996) The worst of both worlds: British regional policy 1951-64. Business History, 38 (4). pp. 41-64. ISSN 1743-7938 doi: 10.1080/00076799600000134

Abstract/Summary

Previous studies have explained ‘passive’ British regional policy during the 1950s largely in terms of contemporary perceptions that the ‘regional problem’ was essentially solved. This article demonstrates that the continuing threat of regional decline was appreciated by the Board of Trade. Arguments in favour of an active regional policy were rejected, however, largely due to the strength of neo-liberal opposition to regional intervention within the government. The evolution of regional policy during its ‘passive’ phase, from 1951 to 1958, is examined, together with the factors which eventually led to a reversal of policy in favour of a long-term, planned, regional development strategy. The article also examines available evidence regarding the costs and benefits of the various approaches to regional policy which were implemented during this period.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/95486
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00076799600000134
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar