Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

How differing conceptions of integrity and self-integration influence how relations are seen and managed and implications for personal and professional development

[thumbnail of document (1).pdf]
Preview
document (1).pdf - Published Version (499kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Archives in Ps. FINAL28 1 2020.pdf]
Archives in Ps. FINAL28 1 2020.pdf - Accepted Version (858kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Akrivou, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-6280, Scalzo, G. and Orón, J. V. (2020) How differing conceptions of integrity and self-integration influence how relations are seen and managed and implications for personal and professional development. Archives of Psychology, 4 (1). ISSN 2573-7902

Abstract/Summary

As human beings, the exercise of our professional roles demands that we relate to others. Relationships, however, challenge the self in a way that requires us to act with integrity. Different approaches to integrity configure diverse ways of cognitively and intuitively feeling and acting in our relationships. Moreover, different ways of understanding human development are related to different ways of understanding integrity in the self. While not an exhaustive account, we sketch out three models of human development that capture much of this diversity, the so-called autonomous self (AS), processual self (PS) and inter-processual self (IPS). Each has a particular way of understanding how self-integrity and congruent action come to be. The AS and PS models understand integrity as internal coherence thanks primarily to rational exercise, with priority given to the content of action, while relations are utilised as resources. AS and PS focus on cognition through rational or emotional and external mastery of our relationships and own integrity (self-integrity is also handled as a cognitive exercise that mirrors how external relations are understood). The IPS understands integrity as the dynamic that leads to growth and cognition itself is a relational act that, when it arises from within, affects all dimensions of the person and hence how we ethically relate to others and ourselves. Different kinds of integrity are also related to practical wisdom. Based on this, we explore consequences of these different ways of understanding self-integration and relationships for approaching management and leadership roles, aiming to open up reflection on relational integrity and personal development via education in the field of management/leadership.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/88894
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Copernicus Publishing
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar