The antecedents of comparative differences in union presence and engagement: evidence from coordinated and liberal market contexts

[thumbnail of 4 Brookes et al ISMO 030619 (002).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Brookes, M., Wood, G. and Brewster, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1518 (2019) The antecedents of comparative differences in union presence and engagement: evidence from coordinated and liberal market contexts. International Studies of Management & Organization, 49 (4). pp. 389-401. ISSN 1558-0911 doi: 10.1080/00208825.2019.1646488

Abstract/Summary

This study employs a large on-going survey database to explore the antecedents of comparative differences in union representation and the extent to which employers engage with them at the workplace, and how this has changed over time. It finds that amongst organizations employing more than 100 employees, there has been no uniform decline in the presence of unions, or engagement by employers with them at the workplace. In other words, although we do not measure the range of topics covered or the impact of such engagement, it is clear that neither the neo-liberal nor the more critical theory suggestions that systems are naturally converging to a common model of minimal union presence and engagement receives much support. Collective employment relations are influenced by comparative capitalisms and, to a lesser extent, legal systems and remain a significant feature of many continental European economies.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/85864
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00208825.2019.1646488
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Informa UK Limited
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar