The IB/ IHRM interface: exploring the potential of intersectional theorizing

[thumbnail of IHRM IB Revised Submitted.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Andersson, U., Brewster, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1518, Minbaeva, D., Narula, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4266-2681 and Wood, G. (2019) The IB/ IHRM interface: exploring the potential of intersectional theorizing. Journal of World Business, 54 (5). 1009988. ISSN 1090-9516 doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998

Abstract/Summary

Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/84114
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar