Understanding the subjective experience of menopause at work: a systematic review and conceptual model

[thumbnail of UPCY_2023_0063_R3_Accepted.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Rowson, T. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-2927 and Jones, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-0502 (2025) Understanding the subjective experience of menopause at work: a systematic review and conceptual model. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. ISSN 1521-0650 doi: 10.1080/10720537.2025.2465611 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

This systematic review adds to the growing interest in the subjective experiences of menopause at work. We take a Power Threat Meaning Framework lens to examine how menopausal women make sense of and respond to their experiences at work. The results indicate that the power associated with the ideal worker standard can be perceived as a threat to menopausal women. In addition to the biological experience of symptoms, workplace factors and individual beliefs influence women’s meaning-making processes, exacerbating or alleviating the sense of threat and impacting women’s threat response and potential emotional distress. Women engage in different coping strategies to reduce distress, depending on their level of agency. We contribute to the literature by introducing the Subjective Menopause at Work conceptual model, explaining how women’s lived experiences of menopause impact their responses and potential outcomes. Our Subjective Menopause at Work conceptual model can be used to inform organizational practices, initiatives and interventions.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120617
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/10720537.2025.2465611
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar