Factor pattern of Auckland individualism-collectivism questionnaire: a study of Turkish sample

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Kılıç, B. and Kamaşak, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-3569 (2009) Factor pattern of Auckland individualism-collectivism questionnaire: a study of Turkish sample. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 11 (5). pp. 25-34. ISSN 1303-2860 doi: 10.4026/1303-2860.2009.0123.x

Abstract/Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the Auckland Individualism-Collectivism Questionnaire in Turkish cultural context. The sample was comprised of 2720 participants, of whom 1314 were women and 1406 men. The questionnaire was developed by Shulruf, Hattie and Dixon (2007), and consisted of 28 items which were rated on a five point Likert scale. It was used as a measurement tool for assessing individualistic and collectivistic attitudes of the participants. The data that were analyzed by the Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation yielded six factors as in the original instrument. Consequently, all dimensions showed consistency with the original scale and these findings revealed the validation of the scale for the Turkish sample. This implication has also supported the efforts of testing a new individualism-collectivism measurement tool for extensive variety of populations.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114552
Identification Number/DOI 10.4026/1303-2860.2009.0123.x
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Is, Guc, The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar