Exploring the vulnerability of practice-like activities: an ethnographic perspective

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Exploring the Vulnerability of Practices_ Author version.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bolade-Ogunfodun, Y. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-6946, Sinnicks, M., Akrivou, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-6280 and Scalzo, G. (2022) Exploring the vulnerability of practice-like activities: an ethnographic perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. 100374. ISSN 2297-7775 doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.1003741

Abstract/Summary

This paper offers an ethnographic case study of a UK-based engineering company in the aftermath of its acquisition, focusing in particular on its R&D unit. The Lab struggled to maintain its practice-based work in an institutional environment that emphasised the pursuit of external goods. We use this case to develop two arguments. Firstly, we illustrate the concept of ‘practice-like’ activities and explore their vulnerability to institutional domination. Secondly, in light of the style of management on display after the takeover, we offer further support to MacIntyre’s critique of management. Finally, based on the empirical data we reflect on the importance of organisational culture, as well as friendship and the achievement of a common good in business organisations for these kinds of activities.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/109043
Identification Number/DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2022.1003741
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Frontiers
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar