Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Embedding stakeholders’ priorities into the low-emission development of the East African dairy sector

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Stakeholders_MS_ERL_Clean_Final_Version.pdf]
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Yesuf, G. U. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0963-2998, Schoneveld, G. C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1157-8222, Zijlstra, M., Hawkins, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5880-4771, Kihoro, E. M., Vernooij, V. and Rufino, M. C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-3290 (2021) Embedding stakeholders’ priorities into the low-emission development of the East African dairy sector. Environmental Research Letters, 16 (6). 064032. ISSN 1748-9326 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abfe2d

Abstract/Summary

A growing body of evidence shows that more intensive dairy systems can be good for both nature and people. Little research considers whether such systems correspond with local priorities and preferences. Using a mixed methods approach, this study examined the effects of three intensification scenarios on milk yield and emission intensities in Kenya and Tanzania. Scenarios included (a) an incremental change to feed management; (b) adaptive change by replacing poor quality grass with nutrient-rich fodder crops; and (c) multiple change involving concurrent improvements to breeds, feeds and concentrate supplementation. These scenarios were co-constructed with diverse stakeholder groups to ensure these resonate with local preferences and priorities. Modelling these scenarios showed that milk yield could increase by 2%–15% with incremental changes to over 200% with multiple changes. Greenhouse gas emission intensities are lowest under the multiple change scenario, reducing by an estimated 44%. While raising yields, incremental change conversely raises emission intensities by 9%. Our results suggest that while future interventions that account for local priorities and preferences can enhance productivity and increase the uptake of practices, far-reaching shifts in practices are needed to reduce the climatic footprint of the dairy sector. Since top-down interventions does not align with local priorities and preferences in many situations, future low-emission development initiatives should place more emphasis on geographic and stakeholder heterogeneity when designing targeting and implementation strategies. This suggests that in low-income countries, bottom-up approaches may be more likely to improve dairy productivity and align with mitigation targets than one-size-fits-all approaches.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/99051
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
Publisher Institute of Physics
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar