Medea is a Good Boy: performing, subverting, and unmasking tragic gender

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Baldwin, O. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-3467 (2020) Medea is a Good Boy: performing, subverting, and unmasking tragic gender. Classical Receptions Journal, 12 (4). pp. 486-501. ISSN 1759-5142 doi: 10.1093/crj/claa012

Abstract/Summary

In 1981, the Spanish playwright Luis Riaza published the play Medea es un buen chico (Medea is a Good Boy). In it, two male actors perform the main roles of Medea and the Nurse, who comment, with references to other fictional love stories, on the relationship between Medea and Jason. When Jason fails to arrive, the fiction is dismantled, revealing Medea’s identity as Jason’s rejected homosexual lover. Medea es un buen chico mixes elements of performativity, meta-theatricality, and myth in order to explore the limits of gender, sexuality, and the perceived social roles and norms they entail. This article explores how Riaza theatrically reflects on the social performativity of gender through the tragic character and story of Medea, her performance and subversion of her own gendered self, and her eventual rejection and social displacement.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/99026
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/crj/claa012
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Classics
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar