Memory of the UK’s 2016 EU Referendum: the effects of valence on the long-term measures of a public event

[thumbnail of 2020_Raw_etal_RR_Final.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Raw, J., Rorke, A., Ellis, J., Murayama, K. and Sakaki, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5765 (2023) Memory of the UK’s 2016 EU Referendum: the effects of valence on the long-term measures of a public event. Emotion, 23 (1). pp. 52-74. ISSN 1931-1516 doi: 10.1037/emo0000788

Abstract/Summary

Emotional public events, relative to nonemotional ones, are typically remembered more accurately, more vividly, and with more confidence. However, the majority of previous studies investigating this have focused on negative public events and less is known about positive ones. The current study examined whether positive and negative public events were remembered in a similar manner by assessing individuals’ memory for the time when they learned the results of the United Kingdom’s 2016 Referendum on its European Union (EU) membership. Participants included U.K. participants who voted to leave the EU in the referendum and found the event highly positive, U.K. participants who voted to remain in the EU and found the event highly negative, and U.S. participants who did not vote and found the event neutral. Data from a total of 851 participants were assessed at four time points over the course of 16 months. Growth curve modeling showed that differences in memory between participants in the Remain group (who reported the highest levels of negative emotion) and those in the Leave group (who reported the highest levels of positive emotion) emerged over time. Specifically, Remain participants maintained higher levels of memory consistency than Leave participants, whereas Leave participants maintained higher levels of memory confidence than Remain participants. These results indicate that positive and negative public events are remembered differently, such that negative valence enhances memory accuracy, while positive valence results in overconfidence.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/98838
Identification Number/DOI 10.1037/emo0000788
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher American Psychological Association
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar