Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

UK consumers’ willingness to try and pay for eggs from insect-fed hens

[thumbnail of Acc3pt3dv3rsion.pdf]
Acc3pt3dv3rsion.pdf - Accepted Version (636kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Spartano, S. and Grasso, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6089-864X (2021) UK consumers’ willingness to try and pay for eggs from insect-fed hens. Future Foods, 3. 100026. ISSN 2666-8335 doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100026

Abstract/Summary

Willingness to try (WTT) and willingness to pay (WTP) for eggs produced from insect-fed hens and the determinants of these behaviours were investigated in the UK. Data from a sample of egg consumers (N=294) was collected using an online survey. Factors influencing WTT and WTP were evaluated using a binary logistic regression and censored (Tobit) regression. Only 17% of participants were aware of insects as a potential animal feed. Most consumers were willing to try (72%) and pay (87%) for the product, with a portion of consumers who were not willing to try but willing to buy at a low enough price. WTT and WTP were most significantly influenced by disgust as a barrier and positive attitudes towards the product as a driver to consumption. This suggests the potential for disgust to be offset by information about the product's benefits. While environmental and animal welfare attitudes did not affect WTT and WTP, food neophobia, previous tasting experience with insects as food, hen welfare concerns and price influenced acceptance and adoption. A substantial proportion of consumers indicated they would pay 18% more for these eggs, suggesting there is potential to introduce them as a premium product in the UK market.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/97142
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health (IFNH)
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar