Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Why are ELEvoHI CME arrival predictions different if based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B heliospheric imager observations?

[thumbnail of Open acces]
Preview
2020SW002674 (1).pdf - Published Version (1MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of 2020SW002674.pdf]
2020SW002674.pdf - Accepted Version (5MB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hinterreiter, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1222-8243, Amerstorfer, T. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-6706, Reiss, M. A., Möstl, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-4152, Temmer, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-7558, Bauer, M., Amerstorfer, U. V. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-5441, Bailey, R. L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-6557, Weiss, A. J., Davies, J. A., Barnard, L. A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-4612 and Owens, M. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-2453 (2021) Why are ELEvoHI CME arrival predictions different if based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B heliospheric imager observations? Space Weather, 19 (3). e2020SW002674. ISSN 1542-7390 doi: 10.1029/2020SW002674

Abstract/Summary

Accurate forecasting of the arrival time and arrival speed of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is a unsolved problem in space weather research. In this study, a comparison of the predicted arrival times and speeds for each CME based, independently, on the inputs from the two STEREO vantage points is carried out. We perform hindcasts using ELlipse Evolution model based on Heliospheric Imager observations (ELEvoHI) ensemble modelling. An estimate of the ambient solar wind conditions is obtained by the Wang‐Sheeley‐Arge/Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation (WSA/HUX) model combination that serves as input to ELEvoHI. We carefully select 12 CMEs between February 2010 and July 2012 that show clear signatures in both STEREO‐A and STEREO‐B HI time‐elongation maps, that propagate close to the ecliptic plane, and that have corresponding in situ signatures at Earth. We find a mean arrival time difference of 6.5 hrs between predictions from the two different viewpoints, which can reach up to 9.5 hrs for individual CMEs, while the mean arrival speed difference is 63 km s−1. An ambient solar wind with a large speed variance leads to larger differences in the STEREO‐A and STEREO‐B CME arrival time predictions (cc = 0.92). Additionally, we compare the predicted arrivals, from both spacecraft, to the actual in situ arrivals at Earth and find a mean absolute error of 7.5 ± 9.5 hrs for the arrival time and 87 ± 111 km s−1 for the arrival speed. There is no tendency for one spacecraft to provide more accurate arrival predictions than the other.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/96267
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher AGU
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar