Some general comparative points on Chao's and Zelterman's estimators of the population size

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Böhning, D.A.W. (2009) Some general comparative points on Chao's and Zelterman's estimators of the population size. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 37 (2). 221 - 236. ISSN 0303-6898 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2009.00676.x

Abstract/Summary

Two simple and frequently used capture–recapture estimates of the population size are compared: Chao's lower-bound estimate and Zelterman's estimate allowing for contaminated distributions. In the Poisson case it is shown that if there are only counts of ones and twos, the estimator of Zelterman is always bounded above by Chao's estimator. If counts larger than two exist, the estimator of Zelterman is becoming larger than that of Chao's, if only the ratio of the frequencies of counts of twos and ones is small enough. A similar analysis is provided for the binomial case. For a two-component mixture of Poisson distributions the asymptotic bias of both estimators is derived and it is shown that the Zelterman estimator can experience large overestimation bias. A modified Zelterman estimator is suggested and also the bias-corrected version of Chao's estimator is considered. All four estimators are compared in a simulation study.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9565
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2009.00676.x
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > Applied Statistics
Uncontrolled Keywords capture–recapture approach , Chao's lower-bound estimator , modified Zelterman estimator , Zelterman's estimator
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar