Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Parsing preferences and individual differences in non-native sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cheng, Y., Rothman, J. and Cunnings, I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5318-0186 (2021) Parsing preferences and individual differences in non-native sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42 (1). pp. 129-151. ISSN 0142-7164 doi: 10.1017/S014271642000065X

Abstract/Summary

Using both offline and online measures, the present study investigates attachment resolution in relative clauses (RC) in English natives (L1) and non-natives (L2). We test how RC resolution interacts with linguistic factors and participant-level individual differences. Previous L1 English studies have demonstrated a low attachment preference and also an “ambiguity advantage”, suggesting that L1ers may not have as strong a low attachment preference as is sometimes claimed. We employ a similar design to examine this effect in L1 and L2 comprehension. Offline results indicate that both groups exhibit a low attachment preference, positively correlated with reading span scores and with proficiency in the L2 group. Online results also suggest a low attachment preference in both groups. However, our data show that individual differences influence online attachment resolution for both native and non-natives; higher lexical processing efficiency correlates with quicker resolution of linguistic conflicts. We argue that the current findings suggest that attachment resolution during L1 and L2 processing share the same processing mechanisms and are modulated by similar individual differences.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/95345
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Literacy and Multilingualism (CeLM)
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Language and Cognition
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar