Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Sooriyarachchi, M.R., Whitehead, J., Matsushita, T., Bolland, K. and Whitehead, A. (2003) Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods. Biometrics, 59 (3). pp. 701-709. ISSN 0006-341X doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00081

Abstract/Summary

In a sequential clinical trial, accrual of data on patients often continues after the stopping criterion for the study has been met. This is termed “overrunning.” Overrunning occurs mainly when the primary response from each patient is measured after some extended observation period. The objective of this article is to compare two methods of allowing for overrunning. In particular, simulation studies are reported that assess the two procedures in terms of how well they maintain the intended type I error rate. The effect on power resulting from the incorporation of “overrunning data” using the two procedures is evaluated.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9457
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/1541-0420.00081
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > Applied Statistics
Uncontrolled Keywords Clinical trials, Delayed data, Interim analysis, Overrunning, P-value function, Sequential methods
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar