Causal effects of an absent crowd on performances and refereeing decisions during Covid-19

Downloads

• Balmer, N., Nevill, A., and A. Williams. 2003. “Modelling home advantage in the Summer Olympic Games.” Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(6): 469-478. • Bar-Eli, M., Krumer, A., and E. Morgulev. 2020. “Ask not what economics can do for sports – Ask what sports can do for economics.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 89, 101597. • Bryson, A., Dolton, P., Reade, J. J., Schreyer, D., and C. Singleton. 2020. “Experimental Effects of an Absent Crowd on Performances and Refereeing Decisions during COVID-19.” IZA Discussion Papers 13578, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). • Buraimo, B., D. Forrest, and R. Simmons. 2010. “The 12th man?: refereeing bias in English and German soccer.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173(2): 431–449. • Burstztyn, L., and R. Jensen. 2017. “Social Image and Economic Behavior in the Field: Identifying, Understanding, and Shaping Social Pressure.” Annual Review of Economics, 9(1), 131–153. • Collins, A., McKenzie, J., and L Vaughan Williams. 2019. “When is a talent contest not a talent contest? Sequential performance bias in expert evaluation.” Economics Letters, 177: 94-98. • Charness, G., and M. Sutter. 2012. “Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3): 157–76. • Cueva, C. 2020, “Animal Spirits in a Beautiful Game. Testing social pressure in professional football during the COVID-19 lockdown” Mimeo, Universidad de Alicante. • Dilger, A., and L. Vischer. 2020. “No Home Bias in Ghost Games.” Discussion Paper of the Institute for Organisational Economics 07/2020, School of Business and Economics, University of Münster. • Dohmen, T., and J. Sauermann. 2016. “Referee Bias.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(4): 679–695. • Endrich, M., and T. Gesche. 2020. “Home-Bias in Referee Decisions: Evidence from 'Ghost Matches' During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Economics Letters, Forthcoming • Ferraresi, M. and G. Gucciardi. 2020. “Team performance and audience: experimental evidence from the football sector.” Working papers 94, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica. • Fischer, K., and Haucap, J. 2020. “Does crowd support drive the home advantage in professional soccer? Evidence from German ghost games during the COVID-19 pandemic.” DICE Discussion Papers 344, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE). • Garicano, L., I. Palacios-Huerta, and C. Prendergast. 2005. “Favouritism Under Social Pressure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2): 208–216. • Goller, D., and A. Krumer. 2020. “Let's meet as usual: Do games played on non-frequent days differ? Evidence from top European soccer leagues.” European Journal of Operational Research, 286(2): 740–754. • McCarrick, D. J., Bilalic, M., Neave, N., and S. Wolfson. 2020. “Home Advantage during the COVID-19 Pandemic in European football.” PsyArXiv. August 11. doi:10.31234/osf.io/2gkht • Palacios-Huerta, I. (2014). “Beautiful game theory: How soccer can help economics.” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. • Pettersson-Lidbom, P., and M. Priks. 2010. “Behavior under social pressure: Empty Italian stadiums and referee bias.” Economics Letters, 108(2): 212–214. • Reade, J. J., D. Schreyer, and C. Singleton. 2020. “Echoes: what happens when football is played behind closed doors?” Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2020-14, Department of Economics, Reading University. • Scoppa, V. 2020. “Social Pressure in the Stadiums: Do Agents Change Behavior without Crowd Support?” IZA Discussion Papers 13595, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). • Sutter, M., and M. Kocher. 2004. “Favouritism of agents - The case of referees’ home bias.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(4):461–469.