Forecaster efficiency, accuracy and disagreement: evidence using individual-level survey data

[thumbnail of differences_efficiency_r3 (1).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 (2022) Forecaster efficiency, accuracy and disagreement: evidence using individual-level survey data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 54 (2-3). pp. 537-568. ISSN 1538-4616 doi: 10.1111/jmcb.12867

Abstract/Summary

Theories of expectations formation sometimes suppose that agents make efficient forecasts given their information sets. We use individual-level data to test whether survey respondents forecasts are efficient. We assess whether there are systematic differences between forecasters in terms of their degrees of contrarianism, and the accuracy of their forecasts, and whether these are explicable by inefficiencies in the use of information. We find that forecaster inefficiency cannot explain persistence in levels of disagreement across forecasters, but there is evidence that the inefficient use of information is responsible for persistent differences in accuracy across forecasters.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/93811
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/jmcb.12867
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar