Shock contagion, asset quality and lending behaviour: the case of war in Eastern Ukraine

[thumbnail of RevisedManuscript.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Pham, T., Talavera, O. and Tsapin, A. (2021) Shock contagion, asset quality and lending behaviour: the case of war in Eastern Ukraine. Kyklos, 74 (2). pp. 243-269. ISSN 1467-6435 doi: 10.1111/kykl.12261

Abstract/Summary

Focusing on the current geopolitical conflict in Eastern Ukraine, this paper examines the economic impact of military intervention on the banking sector and the contagion which is triggered by this type of negative shock. Our study reveals that banks which issued more loans within conflict areas during the pre-conflict period, were subsequently left with a higher level of non-performing loans in the non-conflict markets following the onset of the dispute. This impact can be seen most clearly in the regional markets which are closer geographically to the conflict zone. There is also evidence of the “flight to headquarters” effect in local lending. While banks tend to reduce their credit supply, it is within the regional markets located farther from head offices where the most significant reduction in lending can be observed. Further examination shows that the degree of lending reduction is lesser for politically connected banks and for larger banks. Finally, the negative economic effects of the conflict are long-lasting but less profound once the ceasefire agreements are reached.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/93655
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/kykl.12261
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar