Digital screen time limits and young children's psychological well-being: evidence from a population-based study

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Przybylski, A. K. and Weinstein, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-6617 (2019) Digital screen time limits and young children's psychological well-being: evidence from a population-based study. Child Development, 90 (1). e56-e65. ISSN 0009-3920 doi: 10.1111/cdev.13007

Abstract/Summary

There is little empirical understanding of how young children's screen engagement links to their well‐being. Data from 19,957 telephone interviews with parents of 2‐ to 5‐year‐olds assessed their children's digital screen use and psychological well‐being in terms of caregiver attachment, resilience, curiosity, and positive affect in the past month. Evidence did not support implementing limits (< 1 or < 2 hr/day) as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, once variability in child ethnicity, age, gender, household income, and caregiver educational attainment were considered. Yet, small parabolic functions linked screen time to attachment and positive affect. Results suggest a critical cost–benefit analysis is needed to determine whether setting firm limits constitutes a judicious use of caregiver and professional resources.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/93595
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/cdev.13007
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Development
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Social
Publisher Blackwell Publishers
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar