Evaluating the effectiveness of model specifications and estimation approaches for empirical accounting-based valuation models

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Shen, Y. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-6022 and Stark, A. W. (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of model specifications and estimation approaches for empirical accounting-based valuation models. Accounting and Business Research, 43 (6). pp. 660-682. ISSN 2159-4260 doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.840236

Abstract/Summary

This study considers the effectiveness of different model specifications and estimation approaches for empirical accounting-based valuation models in the UK. Primarily, we are interested in the accounting determinants of market value and, in particular, whether accounting-based valuation models can be estimated that not only have in-sample explanatory power but also potentially can be used as a tool of financial statement analysis in developing useful estimates of value out-of-sample. This requires models to be estimated on one sample, and tested for effectiveness on a different sample. Then, issues of model specification arise, together with choosing between methods of estimating the empirical models, in identifying the effectiveness of each combination. Using the criteria of bias and accuracy to capture effectiveness, we suggest estimation methods and models that, overall, provide the most effective models in this context.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/93579
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00014788.2013.840236
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar