Perceptions of the fourth agricultural revolution: what’s in, what’s out, and what consequences are anticipated?

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of 01Sep2020Manuscript_final_version.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of 01Sep2020Table 1.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of 01Sep2020Table 2.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of 01Sep2020Table 3.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of 01Sep2020Table 4.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Barrett, H. and Rose, D. C. (2022) Perceptions of the fourth agricultural revolution: what’s in, what’s out, and what consequences are anticipated? Sociologia Ruralis, 62 (2). pp. 162-189. ISSN 1467-9523 doi: 10.1111/soru.12324

Abstract/Summary

Technological advancement is seen as one way of sustainably intensifying agriculture. Scholars argue that innovation needs to be responsible, but it is difficult to anticipate the consequences of the ‘fourth agricultural revolution’ without a clear sense of which technologies are included and excluded. The major aims of this paper were to investigate which technologies are being associated with the fourth agricultural revolution, as well as to understand how this revolution is being perceived, whether positive or negative consequences are given equal attention, and what type of impacts are anticipated. To this end, we undertook a content analysis of UK media and policy documents alongside interviews of farmers and advisers. We found that the fourth agricultural revolution is associated with emergent, game-changing technologies, at least in media and policy documents. In these sources, the benefits to productivity and the environment were prioritised with less attention to social consequences, but impacts were overwhelmingly presented positively. Farmers and advisers experienced many benefits of technologies and some predicted higher-tech futures. It was clear, however, that technologies create a number of negative consequences. We reflect on these findings and provide advice to policy-makers about how to interrogate the benefits, opportunities, and risks afforded by agricultural technologies.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/92462
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/soru.12324
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar