Expert communication on Twitter: comparing economists and scientists’ social networks, topics and communicative styles

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of PUS_Expert communication on Twitter_FINALGreyScale_19-0130.R2_Centaur.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Della Giusta, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-4451, Jaworska, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-2245 and Vukadinovic Greetham, D. (2021) Expert communication on Twitter: comparing economists and scientists’ social networks, topics and communicative styles. Public Understanding of Science, 30 (1). pp. 75-90. ISSN 1361-6609 doi: 10.1177/0963662520957252

Abstract/Summary

Experts are increasingly using social media to communicate with the wider public, prompted by the need to demonstrate impact and public engagement. While previous research on the use of social media by experts focused on single topics and performed sentiment analysis, we propose to extend the scope by investigating experts' networks, topics and communicative styles. We perform social and semantic network as well language analysis of top tweeting scientists and economists. We find that economists tweet less, mention fewer people and have fewer Twitter conversations with members of the public than scientists. Scientists use a more informal and involved style and engage wider audiences through multimedia contents, while economists use more jargon, and tend to favour traditional written media. The results point to differences in experts’ communicative practices online that might have to do with the disciplinary ways of ‘talking’ posing obstacles to an effective public communication of expert knowledge.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/92297
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/0963662520957252
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > Centre for the Mathematics of Human Behaviour (CMOHB)
Uncontrolled Keywords Twitter, expert communication, communicative style, networks, sentiment, involvement, corpus linguistics, keywords, key terms
Publisher Sage
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar