Culex quinquefasciatus carrying Wolbachia is less susceptible to entomopathogenic bacteria

Díaz-Nieto, L. M., Gil, M. F., Lazarte, J. N., Perotti, M. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3769-7126 and Beron, C. M. (2021) Culex quinquefasciatus carrying Wolbachia is less susceptible to entomopathogenic bacteria. Scientific Reports, 11 (1). 1094. ISSN 2045-2322 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80034-5

Abstract/Summary

In an attempt to evaluate the susceptibility of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus to bacterial agents, a population naturally infected with a Wolbachia native strain was tested against the action of three well known bacterial mosquitocides, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus wiedmanii and Lysinibacillus sphaericus. Tests were carried out on mosquito larvae with and without Wolbachia (controls). Cx. quinquefasciatus naturally infected with the native wPipSJ strain proved to be more resistant to the pathogenic action of the three mosquitocidal bacterial strains. Additionally, the native Wolbachia pipientis strain wPipSJ was fully characterised using metagenome-assembled genomics, PCR-RFLP (PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) and MLST (MultiLocus Strain Typing) analyses. This Wolbachia strain wPipSJ belongs to haplotype I, group wPip-III and supergroup B, clustering with other mosquito wPip strains, such as wPip PEL, wPip JHB, wPip Mol, and wAlbB; showing the southernmost distribution in America. The cytoplasmic incompatibility phenotype of this strain was revealed via crosses between wildtype (Wolbachia+) and antibiotic treated mosquito populations. The results of the tests with the bacterial agents suggest that Cx. quinquefasciatus naturally infected with the native wPipSJ strain is more susceptible to Bacillus thuringiensis than to the other two mosquitocidal agents.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/92292
Identification Number/DOI	10.1038/s41598-020-80034-5
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher	Nature Publishing Group
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item