Plant variety protection, innovation, and transferability: Some empirical evidence

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Srinivasan, C. S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2537-7675 (2004) Plant variety protection, innovation, and transferability: Some empirical evidence. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26 (4). pp. 445-471. ISSN 1058-7195 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00193.x

Abstract/Summary

Under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, all member-countries of the World Trade Organization are required to provide an "effective" system of plant variety protection within a specific time frame. In many developing countries, this has led to a divisive debate about the fundamental desirability of extending intellectual property rights to agriculture. Empirical studies on the economic impacts of plant variety protection, especially its ability to generate large private sector investments in plant breeding and to facilitate the transfer of technology, have been very limited. This paper examines two aspects of the international experience of plant variety protection: (a) the relationship between legislation, research, and development expenditures and plant variety protection grants, i.e., the innovation effect and (b) the role of plant variety protection in facilitating the flow of varieties across countries, i.e., the transferability effect.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9198
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00193.x
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development
Uncontrolled Keywords FIRM LEVEL, PANEL-DATA, PATENTS, MODELS, RIGHTS
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar