Classifying housing regimes. Is it worth doing? What are the alternatives?

Ball, M. (2020) Classifying housing regimes. Is it worth doing? What are the alternatives? Critical Housing Analysis, 7 (1). pp. 36-48. ISSN 2336-2839 doi: 10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.502

Abstract/Summary

Comparative housing research is hindered by attempts to provide broad empirical categorisations of types of Housing Regimes and their equivalents and sweeping cross-country generalisations about their effects. Regime theory is right to recognise the housing provision is and can be organised in different ways but proselytises too strongly. Real issues and policy debates in countries are instead embedded in the existence of specific, tenure related, networks of housing provision and they widely differ across the world. Taking that on board can lead to more fruitful understandings.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/91274
Identification Number/DOI	10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.502
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Uncontrolled Keywords	Housing policy, housing markets, comparative research
Publisher	Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item