Rewired warfare: rethinking the law of cyber attack

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Schmitt, M. N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7373-9557 (2014) Rewired warfare: rethinking the law of cyber attack. International Review of the Red Cross, 96 (893). pp. 189-206. ISSN 1607-5889 doi: 10.1017/S1816383114000381

Abstract/Summary

The most significant debate regarding the applicability of international humanitarian law to cyber operations involves interpretation of the rules governing cyber “attacks”, as that term is understood in the law. For over a decade, the debate has been a binary one between advocates of the “permissive approach” developed by the author and a “restrictive approach” championed by those who saw the permissive approach as insufficiently protective of the civilian population and other protected persons and objects. In this article, the author analyses that debate, and explains a third approach developed during the Tallinn Manual project. He concludes by suggesting that the Tallinn Manual approach best approximates the contemporary law given the increasing value which societies are attributing to cyber activities.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/89846
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/S1816383114000381
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP) for International Committee of the Red Cross
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar