Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Yield benefits of additional pollination to faba bean vary with cultivar, scale, yield parameter and experimental method

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
s41598-020-58518-1.pdf - Published Version (1MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of bishop et al_srep_resubmission.pdf]
bishop et al_srep_resubmission.pdf - Accepted Version (232kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bishop, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-230X, Garratt, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0196-6013 and Breeze, T. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-8354 (2020) Yield benefits of additional pollination to faba bean vary with cultivar, scale, yield parameter and experimental method. Scientific Reports, 10. 2102. ISSN 2045-2322 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58518-1

Abstract/Summary

The benefits of insect pollination to crop yield are used to justify management decisions across agricultural landscapes but current methods for assessing these benefits may underestimate the importance of context. We quantify how the effects of simulated insect pollination vary between five faba bean cultivars, and to what extent this changes between years, scales, yield parameters, and experimental methods. We do this by measuring responses to standardised hand pollination treatments in controlled experiments in flight cages and in the field. Pollination treatments generally improved yield, but in some cases yield was lower with additional pollination. Pollination dependence varied with cultivar, ranging from 58% (loss in yield mass per plant without pollination) in one cultivar, to a lower yield with pollination in another (-51%). Pollination dependence also varied between flight cage and field experiments (-10% to 37% in the same cultivar and year), year (4 to 33%; same cultivar and yield parameter), and yield parameter (-4% to 46%; same cultivar and year). This variability highlights that to be robust, assessments of pollination benefits need to focus upon marketable crop outputs at a whole-plant or larger scale while including and accounting for the effects of different years, sites, methodologies and cultivars.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/88328
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Crop Science
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar