The influence of aspect ratios and wall heating conditions on flow and passive pollutant exposure in 2D typical street canyons

[thumbnail of 2019_2D urban effect on air pollution.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hang, J., Chen, X., Chen, G., Chen, T., Lin, Y., Luo, Z. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-3958, Zhang, X. and Wang, Q. (2020) The influence of aspect ratios and wall heating conditions on flow and passive pollutant exposure in 2D typical street canyons. Building and Environment, 168. 106536. ISSN 0360-1323 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106536

Abstract/Summary

Deep street canyons and unfavourable meteorological conditions usually induce high pollutant exposure. Validated by experimental data, this paper employs computational fluid dynamic simulations with RNG k-ε model to investigate the flow, and passive pollutant dispersion within scale-model two-dimensional street canyons(H=3m). As a novelty, this paper quantifies the impacts of various wall heating scenarios(bottom, leeward/windward wall and all-wall heating), ambient velocity(Uref=0.5-2m/s, Froude numbers Fr=0.25-4.08, Reynolds numbers Re=95602-382409) and aspect ratios(building height/street width, AR=0.5, 0.67, 1, 2, 3) on personal intake fraction for entire streets(<P_IF>). The governing equations are implicitly discretized by a finite volume method (FVM) and the second-order upwind scheme with Boussinesq model for quantifying buoyancy effects. The SIMPLE scheme is adopted for the pressure and velocity coupling. In most isothermal cases, one-main-vortex structure exists as AR=0.5-3(<P_IF>=0.43-3.96ppm and 1.66-27.51ppm with Uref=2 and 0.5m/s). For non-isothermal cases with Fr=4.08(Uref=2m/s), wind-driven force dominates urban airflow as AR=0.5-1 and four heating conditions attain similar <P_IF>(0.39-0.43ppm, 0.57-0.60ppm, 0.91-0.98ppm). As AR=2, windward and all-wall heating get two-vortex structures with greater <P_IF>(3.18-3.33ppm) than others(<P_IF>=2.13-2.21ppm). As AR=3, leeward-wall heating slightly reduces <P_IF>(∼3.72-3.96ppm), but the other three produce two-vortex structures with greater <P_IF>(6.13-10.32ppm). As Fr=0.25(Uref=0.5m/s), leeward-wall heating always attains smaller <P_IF>(1.20-7.10ppm) than isothermal cases(1.66-27.51ppm) as AR=0.5-3, however the influence of the other three is complicated which sometimes raises or reduces <P_IF>. Overall, smaller background wind speed (Fr=0.25) with two-vortex structures attains much larger <P_IF>. Special attention is required at night(all-wall heating), noon(bottom-heating) and cloudy period(no-wall heating) as AR=2-3, while it is during windward-wall heating and cloudy period for AR=0.5-1.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/87289
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106536
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Urban Living group
Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar