Researchers in the panopticon? Geographies of research, fieldwork and authoritarianism

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript for upload.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Menga, F. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-7748 (2020) Researchers in the panopticon? Geographies of research, fieldwork and authoritarianism. The Geographical Review, 110 (3). pp. 341-357. ISSN 1931-0846 doi: 10.1080/00167428.2019.1684197

Abstract/Summary

Building on an emerging scholarly literature that discusses methodological issues related to the safety of researchers, I explore the lived experiences of Western researchers who conducted fieldwork in authoritarian settings. Through an analysis of power as a relational phenomenon, the article examines the ways in which researchers are subject to diffuse topologies of power that can be deployed in various contexts and at various scales. Evidence suggests that as researchers immerse themselves into fieldwork, their everyday encounters with the authorities make them become progressively aware of their surroundings and of the fact that they might be being observed. Researchers thus discipline themselves and normalize a number of self-policing behaviours and practices that can significantly influence processes of knowledge production.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/87246
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00167428.2019.1684197
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar