Anxious individuals have difficulty learning the causal statistics of aversive environments

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Browning, M., Behrens, T. E., Jocham, G., O'Reilly, J. X. and Bishop, S. J. (2015) Anxious individuals have difficulty learning the causal statistics of aversive environments. Nature Neuroscience, 18 (4). pp. 590-596. ISSN 1097-6256 doi: 10.1038/nn.3961

Abstract/Summary

Statistical regularities in the causal structure of the environment enable us to predict the probable outcomes of our actions. Environments differ in the extent to which action-outcome contingencies are stable or volatile. Difficulty in being able to use this information to optimally update outcome predictions might contribute to the decision-making difficulties seen in anxiety. We tested this using an aversive learning task manipulating environmental volatility. Human participants low in trait anxiety matched updating of their outcome predictions to the volatility of the current environment, as predicted by a Bayesian model. Individuals with high trait anxiety showed less ability to adjust updating of outcome expectancies between stable and volatile environments. This was linked to reduced sensitivity of the pupil dilatory response to volatility, potentially indicative of altered norepinephrinergic responsivity to changes in this aspect of environmental information.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/86894
Identification Number/DOI 10.1038/nn.3961
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Nature
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar