Anonymity and pseudonymity: Free speech’s problem children

[thumbnail of [M&ALR - final draft] Anonymity and Pseudonymity Free Speech's Problem Children .pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Coe, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-4127 (2018) Anonymity and pseudonymity: Free speech’s problem children. Media & Arts Law Review, 22 (2). pp. 173-200. ISSN 1325-1570

Abstract/Summary

Through comparative analysis of US, English, German and European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, this article considers the viability of relying exclusively on either speaker or audience interests to underpin a free speech right within the context of anonymous and pseudonymous social media and online speech. It argues that this approach, which has hitherto been applied in these jurisdictions, can lead to a ‘double-edged sword’: on the one side, pursuant to audience interests, people may be dissuaded from participating in the exchange of information and ideas, because their anonymity or pseudonymity is not protected; on the other side, a constitutionally protected right to free speech based entirely on speaker interests could inadvertently protect unwanted and damaging speech.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/86785
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Melbourne Law School
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar