Effective engagement of conservation scientists with decision-makers

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Rose, D. C., Evans, M. C. and Jarvis, R. M. (2020) Effective engagement of conservation scientists with decision-makers. In: Sutherland, W. J., Brotherton, P. N. M., Davies, Z. G., Ockendon, N., Pettorelli, N. and Vickery, J. A. (eds.) Conservation Research, Policy and Practice. Ecological reviews. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 162-182. ISBN 9781108714587 doi: 10.1017/9781108638210.010

Abstract/Summary

This chapter offers advice on how the conservation science community can effectively engage with decision-makers. The rationales for why we, as scientists, need to do this have been widely discussed in the literature. Often, the reasons offered are normative, pragmatic, or instrumental (de Vente, 2016); in other words, there is a belief that engaging with decision-makers leads to better informed, more acceptable decisions. Indeed, better engagement may lead to the greater uptake of evidence for conservation decisions, something which some scholars argue is a priority for effective management (e.g. Gardner et al., 2018; Sutherland and Wordley, 2017).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/86620
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/9781108638210.010
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar