Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

A corpus study of 'know': on the verification of philosophers' frequency claims about language

[thumbnail of Corpus Anon.pdf]
Corpus Anon.pdf - Accepted Version (331kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hansen, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-1075, Porter, J. D. and Francis, K. (2021) A corpus study of 'know': on the verification of philosophers' frequency claims about language. Episteme, 18 (2). pp. 242-268. ISSN 1750-0117 doi: 10.1017/epi.2019.15

Abstract/Summary

We investigate claims about the frequency of "know" made by philosophers. Our investigation has several overlapping aims. First, we aim to show what is required to confirm or disconfirm philosophers' claims about the comparative frequency of different uses of philosophically interesting expressions. Second, we aim to show how using linguistic corpora as tools for investigating meaning is a productive methodology, in the sense that it yields discoveries about the use of language that philosophers would have overlooked if they remained in their "armchairs of an afternoon", to use J.L. Austin's phrase. Third, we discuss facts about the meaning of "know" that so far have been ignored in philosophy, with the aim of reorienting discussions of the relevance of ordinary language for philosophical theorizing.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/83164
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Cognition Research (CCR)
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Uncontrolled Keywords corpus linguistics, philosophy of language, knowledge, epistemology, know, meaning, ordinary language philosophy
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar