Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Evaluation of the eNutri automated personalised nutrition advice by users and nutrition professionals in the UK

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
journal.pone.0214931.pdf - Published Version (874kB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Manuscript_v2.pdf]
Manuscript_v2.pdf - Accepted Version (330kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Fallaize, R., Franco, R. Z., Hwang, F. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-3869 and Lovegrove, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-9455 (2019) Evaluation of the eNutri automated personalised nutrition advice by users and nutrition professionals in the UK. PLoS ONE, 14 (4). e0214931. ISSN 1932-6203 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214931

Abstract/Summary

Nutrition apps have great potential to support people to improve their diets, but few apps give automated validated personalised nutrition advice. A web app capable of delivering automated personalised food-based nutrition advice (eNutri) was developed. The aims of this study were to i) evaluate and optimise the personalised nutrition report provided by the app and ii) compare the personalised food-based advice with nutrition professionals’ standards to aid validation. A study with nutrition professionals (NP) compared the advice provided by the app against professional Registered Dietitians (RD) (n=16) and Registered Nutritionists (RN) (n=16) standards. Each NP received two pre-defined scenarios, comprising an individual’s characteristics and dietary intake based on an analysis of a food frequency questionnaire, along with the nutrition food-based advice that was automatically generated by the app for that individual. NPs were asked to use their professional judgment to consider the scenario, provide their three most relevant recommendations for that individual, then consider the app’s advice and rate their level of agreement via 5-star scales (with 5 as complete agreement). NPs were also asked to comment on the eNutri recommendations, scores generated and overall impression. The mean scores for the appropriateness, relevance and suitability of the eNutri diet messages were 3.5, 3.3 and 3.3 respectively.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/82966
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Biomedical Sciences
Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences > Human Nutrition Research Group
Publisher Public Library of Science
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar