An investigation of the effects of PICSA on smallholder farmers’ decision-making and livelihoods when implemented at large scale – the case of Northern Ghana

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Manuscript_CS_Clean copy.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clarkson, G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-4773, Dorward, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-3693, Osbahr, H. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0130-2313, Torgbor, F. and Kankam-Boadu, I. (2019) An investigation of the effects of PICSA on smallholder farmers’ decision-making and livelihoods when implemented at large scale – the case of Northern Ghana. Climate Services, 14. pp. 1-14. ISSN 2405-8807 doi: 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.02.002

Abstract/Summary

Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) is an approach that has been used to date in 20 countries and benefited tens of thousands of households including over 5,000 in Northern Ghana and 75,000 in Rwanda. PICSA involves trained field staff or community volunteers working with groups of farmers and includes farmers: using both historical climate information and forecasts; exploring practical options to address challenges and; using participatory decision making tools to evaluate and plan options for individual farm contexts. A survey of randomly selected farmers and detailed case studies was used in Northern Ghana to investigate the influence of PICSA on farmer’s decision-making, livelihoods, and innovation behaviours. Ninety seven percent of farmers had made changes to their practices (mean of three per farmer), including starting new enterprises and a wide range of management practices. Farmers described positive effects including on income and food security and importantly on wellbeing, and confidence in their abilities to address climate change and variability. In case study interviews farmers clearly explained the rationale for their changes as well as reporting how they actively sought and obtained further technical information and resources. Innovation processes observed are in stark contrast to those associated with linear dissemination of technology models.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/82121
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.02.002
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of International Development
Uncontrolled Keywords Climate variability, Climate change, Participatory approaches, Options by context, Smallholder farmers
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar