Whose culture? Fanzines, politics and agency

[thumbnail of 03. Chapter 3 Worley.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Worley, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-8714 (2018) Whose culture? Fanzines, politics and agency. In: Ripped, Torn and Cut: Pop, Politics and Punk Fanzines from 1976. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 55-71. ISBN 9781526120595

Abstract/Summary

This chapter offers a case study of three punk-related fanzines. The three ‘zines considered – JOLT, Anathema and Hard As Nails – each, in their different ways, sought to inform and (re)direct the cultures of which they formed part. They voiced opinion and contributed to a conversation. Beneath any prevailing cultural narrative, be it defined in newsprint or captured on film to be replayed over-and-over as disembodied spectacle, lay alternate interpretations scribbled, typed and held together with glue and staples. In fanzines we find cultures recorded from the bottom-up rather than the top-down.

Additional Information Edited by Subcultures Network
Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/81421
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Language Text and Power
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Identities
Additional Information Edited by Subcultures Network
Publisher Manchester University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar