An environmental impact assessment of the management of cassava waste: a case study in Thailand

[thumbnail of document (1).pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Permanent Publisher Embargo]
Text (Permanent Publisher Embargo) - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Prakobboon, N., Vahdati, M. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8604-3004 and Shahrestani, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-0912 (2018) An environmental impact assessment of the management of cassava waste: a case study in Thailand. International Journal of Biomass & Renewables, 7 (2). pp. 18-29. ISSN 2289-1692

Abstract/Summary

In Thailand, cassava waste is one of the main biomass residues and has the potential to be used as a biomass fuel. However, currently most cassava waste in Thailand is left in agricultural fields or burnt on site and is not utilised for any energy-related purposes. This research investigates the environmental impacts associated with three cassava waste management practices including (i)- ploughing the waste to the soil (ii)-burning the waste in the field (iii)- collecting and using the waste in cassava-based bioethanol plant. The environmental impact assessment and material flow analysis associated with these management practices were conducted using the Global Emissions Model for Integrated Systems (GEMIS) package [1]. The outcomes of this study reveal that the CO2 emissions associated with these waste management practices are about 0.195, 0.243 and 0.361 kg CO2-eq/kg of as received (wet) cassava waste, respectively. Compared to other cassava waste disposal methods such as ploughing and burning, cassava waste collection would result in the biggest environmental impact, emitting nearly 85% more GHGs than ploughing and 48% more than burning.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/79411
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
Publisher Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar