Intermediality in Brazilian cinema: the case of Tropicália

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Nagib, L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-9748 and Solomon, S., eds. (2019) Intermediality in Brazilian cinema: the case of Tropicália. Screen, 60 (1). Oxford Academic. doi: 10.1093/screen/hjy064

Abstract/Summary

The contributors to this proposed dossier are investigators on the AHRC-FAPESP funded Intermidia Project, which explores the uses and possible advantages of intermediality as a historiographic method applicable to cinema in general, and Brazilian cinema in particular. The choice of the artistic movement known as ‘Tropicália’ or ‘Tropicalism’ as the dossier’s common thread is due, in the first place, to its strong reliance on intermediality. This short-lived movement, stretching for a few years between the late 1960s and the early 1970s, unleashed a veritable artistic and political earthquake whose aftershocks can be felt up to today, as testified by the multiple celebrations of the movement’s 50th anniversary in 2017 taking place all over the world.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information Edited dossier of Screen, ISSN 0036-9543. DOI is for the introduction to the dossier.
Item Type Book
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/79205
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/screen/hjy064
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Film, Theatre & Television
Uncontrolled Keywords Brazilian Cinema; Intermediality; Film History; Film Theory; Tropicália; Tropicalism
Additional Information Edited dossier of Screen, ISSN 0036-9543. DOI is for the introduction to the dossier.
Publisher Oxford Academic
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar