Efficient or adaptive markets? Evidence from major stock markets using very long run historic data

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Urquhart, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-4243 and Hudson, R. (2013) Efficient or adaptive markets? Evidence from major stock markets using very long run historic data. International Review of Financial Analysis, 28. pp. 130-142. ISSN 1057-5219 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.03.005

Abstract/Summary

This paper empirically investigates the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) in three of the most established stock markets in the world; the US, UK and Japanese markets using very long run data. Daily data is divided into five-yearly subsamples and subjected to linear and nonlinear tests to determine how the independence of stock returns has behaved over time. Further, a five-type classification is proposed to distinguish the differing be haviour of stock returns. The results from the linear autocorrelation, runs and variance ratio tests reveal that each market shows evidence of being an adaptive market, with returns going through periods of independence and dependence. However, the results from the nonlinear tests show strong dependence for every subsample in each market, although the magnitude of dependence varies quite considerably. Thus the linear dependence of stock returns varies over time but nonlinear dependence is strong throughout. Our overall results suggest that the AMH provides a better description of the behaviour of stock returns than the Efficient Market Hypothesis.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/79162
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.03.005
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar