Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

The influence of soil communities on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration

[thumbnail of Johnston & Sibly Accepted MS.pdf]
Preview
Johnston & Sibly Accepted MS.pdf - Accepted Version (692kB) | Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Johnston, A. S. A. and Sibly, R. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-3543 (2018) The influence of soil communities on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2. pp. 1597-1602. ISSN 2397-334X doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0648-6

Abstract/Summary

Soil respiration represents a major carbon flux between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere, and is expected to accelerate under climate warming. Despite its importance in climate change forecasts, however, our understanding of the effects of temperature on soil respiration (RS) is incomplete. Using a metabolic ecology approach we link soil biota metabolism, community composition and heterotrophic activity, to predict RS rates across five biomes. We find that accounting for the ecological mechanisms underpinning decomposition processes predicts climatological RS variations observed in an independent dataset (n = 312). The importance of community composition is evident because without it RS is substantially underestimated. With increasing temperature, we predict a latitudinal increase in RS temperature sensitivity, with Q10 values ranging between 2.33 ±0.01 in tropical forests to 2.72 ±0.03 in tundra. This global trend has been widely observed, but has not previously been linked to soil communities.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/78849
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher Nature
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar