Stakeholder perceptions of the environmental effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives: evidence from the palm oil, soy, cotton, and timber programs

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of MSIs_stakeholder perception accepted manucript for centaur.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Okereke, C. and Stacewicz, I. (2018) Stakeholder perceptions of the environmental effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives: evidence from the palm oil, soy, cotton, and timber programs. Society and Natural Resources, 31 (11). pp. 1302-1318. ISSN 1521-0723 doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1482037

Abstract/Summary

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), and the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) are examples of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives (MSIs), established to drive sustainable commodity production. While these programs are promoted as good models of collaborative schemes for natural resource management, the significant gap in understanding of MSIs’ effectiveness presents a major concern over the credibility and legitimacy of such programs. Here, we explore stakeholders’ perceptions of the environmental effectiveness of the above four MSIs in relation to their impacts in reducing agrochemical use and conserving habitats. We found that stakeholders feel positive about the role of the four schemes in advocating environmental sustainability in the commodity sectors, and establishing norms of good practice. However, numerous issues, including the lack of monitoring and evaluation contribute to perceptions of ineffectiveness and a lack of confidence in these schemes in meeting their objectives.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/77461
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/08941920.2018.1482037
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar