Comparison of different clustering methods for investigating, individual differences using choice experiments

[thumbnail of Final version submitted before proofs.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Asioli, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-8450, Berget, I. and Næs, T. (2018) Comparison of different clustering methods for investigating, individual differences using choice experiments. Food Research International, 111. pp. 371-378. ISSN 0963-9969 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.029

Abstract/Summary

Different strategies for investigating individual differences among consumers using choice experiments are compared. The paper is based on a consumer study of iced coffee in Norway. Consumers (n = 102) performed a choice task of twenty different iced coffee profiles varying in coffee type, production origin, calorie content and price following an orthogonal design. Consumer factors, such as socio-demographics, attitudes and habits, were also collected. Choice data will be analysed using two different clustering strategies. Strategy one is the most classical approach called Latent Class Logit (LCL) model, while Strategy two uses Mixed Logit (ML) model combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for visual segmentation or with automatic clustering detection using Fuzzy C Means clustering (FCM). The clusters obtained can be interpreted using external consumer factors by using the Partial Least Square – Discrimination Analysis (PLS-DA) model. The different approaches are compared in terms of data analysis methodologies, modeling, outcomes, interpretation, flexibility, practical issues and user friendliness.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/77367
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.029
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar