Historical knowledge in a knowledge economy – what types of knowledge matter?

Download

[thumbnail of Historical knowledge and the knowledge economy_not for review_for centaur.pdf]

Preview

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Harris, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-5515 and Ormond, B. (2019) Historical knowledge in a knowledge economy – what types of knowledge matter? Educational Review, 71 (5). pp. 564-580. ISSN 1465-3397 doi: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1462764

Abstract/Summary

This article examines the potential of history as a subject to contribute to a ‘knowledge economy’. Global trends in curricula reforms have often emphasised generic competences and development of students’ critical thinking to benefit the future economic position of citizens and nations. However, viewing knowledge in these terms presents a reductive view, particularly given that there is no clear definition of the nature of the knowledge which could or should be universally deployed in the pursuit of a ‘knowledge economy’. This paper presents an argument that a focus on ‘powerful’ disciplinary knowledge and ‘valuable’ frameworks of knowledge, in areas such as history education rather than generic competences and skills, would better serve a knowledge economy. Drawing on two empirical studies from England and New Zealand, which present different policy contexts, the paper explores the extent to which the potential of history education is being realised to develop such powerful and valuable knowledge. The data reveal similar patterns in both contexts; despite the history teachers in both countries sharing a disciplinary understanding of the subject this is not comprehensively reflected in the curricula they construct, and there are few attempts to create coherent frameworks of knowledge. This suggests that the opportunities for history education to support the development of a knowledge economy have not been fully realised and exploited.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/76374
Identification Number/DOI	10.1080/00131911.2018.1462764
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Improving Equity and Inclusion through Education
Uncontrolled Keywords	history curriculum; knowledge; knowledge economy; disciplinary knowledge: curriculum; curriculum design
Publisher	Routledge
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	11 Apr 2018 13:27	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	19 Nov 2024 02:37	Date item last modified

References

Allais, S. 2012. “‘Economics imperialism’, education policy and educational theory.” Journal of Education Policy, 27: 253-274. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2011.602428 Ball, S. 2017. The Education Debate. 3rd ed. Bristol: Policy Press. Barton, K. & L. Levstik. 2004. Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Cain, T., & A. Chapman. 2014. “Dysfunctional dichotomies? Deflating bipolar constructions of curriculum and pedagogy through case studies from music and history.” The Curriculum Journal 25: 111–129. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2013.877396. Counsell, C. 2003. “Fulfilling history’s potential: nurturing tradition and renewal in a subject community.” In Past Forward: A vision for school history 2002-2012, edited by M. Riley & R. Harris (Eds), 6-11. London: Historical Association. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (DBIS). 2016. Success as a knowledge economy: teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: HMSO. Department for Education (DfE). 2010. The importance of teaching: The schools White Paper. Norwich: TSO. Duncan, A. 2011. “Improving human capital in a competitive world - education reform in the U.S.” US Department of Education. https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/improving-human-capital-competitive-world-education-reform-us Education Scotland. 2017. “What is Curriculum for Excellence?” https://education.gov.scot/scottish-education-system/policy-for-scottish-education/policy-drivers/cfe-%28building-from-the-statement-appendix-incl-btc1-5%29/What%20is%20Curriculum%20for%20Excellence Foster, S., R. Ashby, P. Lee & J. Howson. 2008. Usable Historical Pasts: A study of students' frameworks of the past: Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report (RES-000-22-1676). Swindon: ESRC. Harris, R., & K. Burn. 2011. “Curriculum theory, curriculum policy and the problem of ill-disciplined thinking.” Journal of Education Policy 26: 245–261. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.498902. Harris, R. & R. Reynolds. 2017. “Exploring teachers’ curriculum decision making: insights from history education.” Oxford Review of Education. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2017.1352498 Hirsch, E.D. 1993. “The core knowledge curriculum – what’s behind its success?” Educational Leadership 50: 23-30. Lauder, H., M. Young, H. Daniels, M. Balarin & J. Lowe. 2012. Educating for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives. London: Routledge. Lee, P. 2007. “From national canon to historical literacy.” In Beyond the canon: History for the twenty first century edited by M. Grever & S. Stuurman, 48-62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. McPhail, G. & Rata, E. 2016. “Comparing Curriculum Types: ‘Powerful Knowledge’ and ‘21st Century Learning’.” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 51: 53-68. doi: 10.1007/s40841-015-0025-9. OECD. 1996. The knowledge-based economy. OECD: Paris. OECD. 2001. Competences for the knowledge economy. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/research/1842070.pdf OECD. 2016. Policy priorities for making Poland a more inclusive and knowledge-based economy. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/0316121e.pdf?expires=1519588925&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=71DACAC77DD8F71F168062640BBBCFBD Ormond, B. M., & J. Morgan, J. 2015. “A history curriculum for New Zealand in the 21st century.” In The 21st Century Curriculum?, edited by J. Morgan, 152-161. Auckland: Edify Ltd. Ormond, B.M. 2014. “Powerful knowledge in history - disciplinary strength or weakened episteme?” In Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism, edited by B. Barrett & E. Rata, 153-166. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ormond, B.M. 2016. “Curriculum decisions – the challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history.” Journal of Curriculum Studies. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225 Ormond, B.M. 2018. “Conceptions of knowledge in history teaching”. In Knowledge, Curriculum and Equity - Social Realist Perspectives, edited by B. Barrett, U. Hoadley & J. Morgan, 102-116. London: Routledge. Porter, M. E. 1998. “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition.” Harvard Business Review 76: 77–90. Robertson, S. 2005. “Re-imagining and rescripting the future of education: global knowledge economy discourses and the challenges to education systems.” Comparative Education 41 (2): 151-170. doi: 10.1080/03050060500150922. Rüsen, J. 2004. “Historical consciousness: Narrative structure, moral function, and ontological development”. In Theorizing historical consciousness, edited by P. Seixas, 63-85. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Seixas, P. & T. Morton. 2012. The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education. Shemilt, D. 2009. “Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: how adolescents make sense of history.” In National History Standards: the problem of the canon and the future of teaching history, edited by L. Symcox & A. Wilschut, 141-210. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. US Department of Education. 2010. Transforming American education national education technology plan. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010.pdf Veugelers, R & M. Mojmir. 2009. The knowledge economy and the catching-up member states of the European Union. Report prepared for Commissioner’s Potocnik’s Expert Group, “Knowledge for Growth. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/kfg_report_no5.pdf Wheelahan, L. 2007. “How Competency-Based Training Locks the Working Class out of Powerful Knowledge.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 28: 637-651. doi: 10.1080/01425690701505540 Wilschut, A. 2009. “Canonical standards or orientational frames of reference? The cultural and educational approach to the debate about standards in history teaching.” In National History Standards: the problem of the canon and the future of teaching history, edited by L. Symcox & A. Wilschut, 117-140. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Wineburg, S. 2001. Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Winter, C. 2012. “School curriculum, globalisation and the constitution of policy problems and solutions.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (3): 295-314. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2011.609911. Young, M. 2016. “School subjects as powerful knowledge: Reflections on the chapters by Rachel Foster, Ellen Buxton and Michael Fordham.” (pp. 185-193). In Masterclass in history education: transforming teaching and learning, edited by C. Counsell, K. Burn & A. Chapman, 185-193. London: Bloomsbury. Young, M. and J. Muller. 2010. “Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: Lessons from the Sociology of Knowledge.” European Journal of Education 45 (1): 11–27.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar