Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation

Download

Preview

Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Thomson, S. A., Pyle, R. L., Ahyong, S. T., Alonso-Zarazaga, M., Ammirati, J., Araya, J. F., Ascher, J. S., Audisio, T. L., Azevedo-Santos, V. M., Bailly, N., Baker, W. J., Balke, M., Barclay, M. V. L., Barrett, R. L., Benine, R. C., Bickerstaff, J. R. M., Bouchard, P., Bour, R., Bourgoin, T., Boyko, C. B., Breure, A. S. H., Brothers, D. J., Byng, J. W., Campbell, D., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Cernák, I., Cerretti, P., Chang, C.-H., Cho, S., Copus, J. M., Costello, M. J., Cseh, A., Csuzdi, C., Culham, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-0133, D'Elía, G., d'Udekem d'Acoz, C., Daneliya, M. E., Dekker, R., Dickinson, E. C., Dickinson, T. A., van Dijk, P. P., Dijkstra, K.-D. B., Dima, B., Dmitriev, D. A., Duistermaat, L., Dumbacher, J. P., Eiserhardt, W. L., Ekrem, T., Evenhuis, N. L., Faille, A., Fernández-Triana, J. L., Fiesler, E., Fishbein, M., Fordham, B. G., Freitas, A. V. L., Friol, N. R., Fritz, U., Frøslev, T., Funk, V. A., Gaimari, S. D., Garbino, G. S. T., Garraffoni, A. R. S., Geml, J., Gill, A. C., Gray, A., Grazziotin, F. G., Greenslade, P., Gutiérrez, E. E., Harvey, M. S., Hazevoet, C. J., He, K., He, X., Helfer, S., Helgen, K. M., van Heteren, A. H., Hita Garcia, F., Holstein, N., Horváth, M. K., Hovenkamp, P. H., Hwang, W. S., Hyvönen, J., Islam, M. B., Iverson, J. B., Ivie, M. A., Jaafar, Z., Jackson, M. D., Jayat, J. P., Johnson, N. F., Kaiser, H., Klitgård, B. B., Knapp, D. G., Kojima, J.-I., Kõljalg, U., Kontschán, J., Krell, F.-T., Krisai-Greilhuber, I., Kullander, S., Latella, L., Lattke, J. E., Lencioni, V., Lewis, G. P., Lhano, M. G., Lujan, N. K., Luksenburg, J. A., Mariaux, J., Marinho-Filho, J., Marshall, C. J., Mate, J. F., McDonough, M. M., Michel, E., Miranda, V. F. O., Mitroiu, M.-D., Molinari, J., Monks, S., Moore, A. J., Moratelli, R., Murányi, D., Nakano, T., Nikolaeva, S., Noyes, J., Ohl, M., Oleas, N. H., Orrell, T., Páll-Gergely, B., Pape, T., Papp, V., Parenti, L. R., Patterson, D., Pavlinov, I. Y., Pine, R. H., Poczai, P., Prado, J., Prathapan, D., Rabeler, R. K., Randall, J. E., Rheindt, F. E., Rhodin, A. G. J., Rodríguez, S. M., Rogers, D. C., Roque, F. d. O., Rowe, K. C., Ruedas, L. A., Salazar-Bravo, J., Salvador, R. B., Sangster, G., Sarmiento, C. E., Schigel, D. S., Schmidt, S., Schueler, F. W., Segers, H., Snow, N., Souza-Dias, P. G. B., Stals, R., Stenroos, S., Stone, R. D., Sturm, C. F., Štys, P., Teta, P., Thomas, D. C., Timm, R. M., Tindall, B. J., Todd, J. A., Triebel, D., Valdecasas, A. G., Vizzini, A., Vorontsova, M. S., de Vos, J. M., Wagner, P., Watling, L., Weakley, A., Welter-Schultes, F., Whitmore, D., Wilding, N., Will, K., Williams, J., Wilson, K., Winston, J. E., Wüster, W., Yanega, D., Yeates, D. K., Zaher, H., Zhang, G., Zhang, Z.-Q. and Zhou, H.-Z. (2018) Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation. PLoS biology, 16 (3). e2005075. ISSN 1545-7885 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075

Abstract/Summary

Taxonomy is a scientific discipline that has provided the universal naming and classification system of biodiversity for centuries and continues effectively to accommodate new knowledge. A recent publication by Garnett and Christidis [1] expressed concerns regarding the difficulty that taxonomic changes represent for conservation efforts and proposed the establishment of a system to govern taxonomic changes. Their proposal to “restrict the freedom of taxonomic action” through governing subcommittees that would “review taxonomic papers for compliance” and their assertion that “the scientific community’s failure to govern taxonomy threatens the effectiveness of global efforts to halt biodiversity loss, damages the credibility of science, and is expensive to society” are flawed in many respects. They also assert that the lack of governance of taxonomy damages conservation efforts, harms the credibility of science, and is costly to society. Despite its fairly recent release, Garnett and Christidis' proposition has already been rejected by a number of colleagues [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Herein, we contribute to the conversation between taxonomists and conservation biologists aiming to clarify some misunderstandings and issues in the proposition by Garnett and Christidis.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/76118
Identification Number/DOI	10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Central Services > Academic and Governance Services > University Museums and Special Collections
Uncontrolled Keywords	Taxonomy, Conservation, Herbarium, Heritage, Nomenclature
Publisher	PLoS
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	27 Mar 2018 09:02	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	22 Mar 2025 02:37	Date item last modified

References

1. Garnett ST, Christidis L. Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation. Nature. 2017;546(7656):25–27. pmid:28569833 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 2. Raposo MA, Stopiglia R, Brito GRR, Bockmann FA, Kirwan GM, Gayon J, Dubois A. What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017). Zootaxa, 2017;4317(1), pp.179–184. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 3. Holstein N. and Luebert F., 2017. Taxonomy: stable taxon boundaries. Nature, 548(7666), pp.158–158. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 4. Cotterill FP., Groves CP., Taylor PJ., 2017. Taxonomy: refine rather than stabilize. Nature, 547(7662), pp.162–162. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 5. Jackson MD, Scherz MD, Zona S. 2017. Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies: a rebuttal to Garnett and Christidis (2017) PeerJ Preprints 5:e3060v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3060v1 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 6. Hollingsworth PM, 2017. Taxonomy: avoid extra bureaucracy. Nature, 546(7660), pp.600–600. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 7. Lambertz M., 2017. Taxonomy: retain scientific autonomy. Nature, 546(7660), pp.600–600. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 8. Funk VA, Herendeen P, Knapp S., 2017. Taxonomy: naming algae, fungi, plants. Nature, 546(7660), pp.599–599. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 9. Hey J, Waples RS, Arnold ML, Butlin RK, Harrison RG. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18(11):597–603. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 10. Thiele K, Yeates D. Tension arises from duality at the heart of taxonomy. Nature. 2002;419(6905):337. pmid:12353005 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 11. Thomson S. Management implications of poor alpha taxonomy. Aust. Wildl. Mgmt Soc. Newsl. 1997 March;14–16. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 12. Sangster G, Luksenburg JA. Declining rates of species described per taxonomist: slowdown of progress or a side-effect of improved quality in taxonomy? Syst Biol. 2014;64(1):144–151. pmid:25190593 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 13. Chapman AD. Numbers of living species in Australia and the World. 2nd ed. Canberra: Australian Biological Resources Study; 2009. 14. Kaiser H, Crother BI, Kelly CMR, Luiselli L, O’Shea M, Ota H, et al. Best practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review. Herpetol Rev. 2013;44(1):8–23. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 15. Rhodin AGJ, Kaiser H, van Dijk PP, Wüster W, O’Shea M, Archer M, et al. Comment on Spracklandus Hoser, 2009 (Reptilia, Serpentes, ELAPIDAE): request for confirmation of availability of the generic name and for the nomenclatural validation of the journal in which it was published. Bull Zool Nomencl. 2015;72(1):65–78. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 16. De Queiroz K. 2007. Species Concepts and Species Delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56 (6): 879–886, https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083 pmid:18027281 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 17. Mayden R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Claridge M. F., Dawah H. A. & Wilson M. R. (eds.), Species: The units of diversity,. Chapman & Hall. pp. 381–423 18. Wheeler QD, Meier R. 2000. Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: a debate. Columbia University Press, New York 19. Zachos FE. 2016. Species concepts in biology. Historical development, theoretical foundations and practical relevance. Springer, Cham 20. Evans DM, Che-Castaldo JP, Crouse D, Davis FW, Epanchin-Niell R, Flather CH, et al. Species recovery in the United States: increasing the effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act. Issues in Ecology. 2016;20:1–28. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 21. Morrison WR, Lohr JL, Duchen P, Wilches R, Trujillo D, Mair M, Renner SS. The impact of taxonomic change on conservation: Does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant?. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(12):3201–3206. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 22. Gippoliti S, Cotterill FPD, Zinner D, Groves CP. Impacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation of African ungulate diversity: an overview. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. pmid:28429851 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 23. CITES. Standard nomenclature. Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP17). [Cited 11 May 2017]. Available from: https://cites.org/eng/res/12/12-11R17.php. 24. Hazevoet CJ. Conservation and species lists: taxonomic neglect promotes the extinction of endemic birds, as exemplified by taxa from eastern Atlantic islands. Bird Conserv Int. 1996;6(2):181–196. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 25. Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM. 2013. Outdated taxonomy blocks conservation. Nature, 495: 314. pmid:23518556 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 26. Costello MJ, May RM, Stork NE 2013. Response to Comments on “Can we name Earth’s species before they go extinct?” Science 341, 237. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 27. Donegan T, Quevedo A, Verhelst JC, Cortés-Herrera O, Ellery T, Salaman P. Revision of the status of bird species occurring or reported in Colombia 2015, with discussion of BirdLife International’s new taxonomy. Conservación Colombiana. 2015;23:3–48. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 28. Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A. Controlling the taxonomic variable: taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2016;2:e10610. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 29. Schuh RT. The Linnaean system and its 250-year persistence. Bot Rev. 2003;69(1):59–78. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 30. Pickett STA, Ostfeld RS, Shachak M, Likens GE (eds). The ecological basis of conservation. Heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Dordrecht: Springer; 1997.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar