Cobalt and nickel uptake by silica-based extractants

[thumbnail of Pepper_CoNiuptake by EBP-Si-1 (1).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Pepper, S. E., Whittle, K. R., Harwood, L. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-7380, Cowell, J., Lee, T. S. and Ogden, M. D. (2018) Cobalt and nickel uptake by silica-based extractants. Separation Science and Technology, 53 (10). pp. 1552-1562. ISSN 0149-6395 doi: 10.1080/01496395.2017.1405034

Abstract/Summary

The pKas of ethyl/butyl phosphonate silica (EBP-Si) have been determined, and the removal of cobalt and nickel from solution was investigated as a function of various parameters and compared with those of Purolite S950. pH uptake experiments suggested a combination of ion exchange and acid dissociation of the surface occurring. Isotherm data, fitted using the Langmuir and Dubinin–Radushkevich (D-R) models, indicated that stronger complexes formed with S950 than with EBP-Si. Kinetic data, fitted using a pseudo-second-order model, suggested that the rate-determining process is the reaction of metal ions with the chelating functionality of the resin. Uptake by EBP-Si is two to three times faster than that on S950.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/74598
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/01496395.2017.1405034
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Chemistry
Uncontrolled Keywords Filtration and Separation, Process Chemistry and Technology, General Chemistry, General Chemical Engineering
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar