What makes a judgement a moral judgement

[thumbnail of Hooker__Moral_Judgements-2.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of What Makes Judgements Moral Judgements_.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hooker, B. (2017) What makes a judgement a moral judgement. Journal of Political Theory and Philosophy, 1 (1). pp. 97-112.

Abstract/Summary

What distinguishes moral judgements from judgements of other kinds? In addressing this question, this paper tries to remain as neutral as possible about which moral judgments are correct. The paper addresses objections to thinking that the defining feature of moral judgements is their other-regarding grounds, or their social function, or their motivational force, or their connection to reactive attitudes such as guilt, indignation, and resentment. The proposal this paper makes is that a judgment is a moral judgment if and only if this judgment is a member of a group of judgments of which some do carry commitment to the appropriateness of such reactive attitudes.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/74596
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher JPTP
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar