Genotypic variability enhances the reproducibility of an ecological study

[thumbnail of Milcu et al 2017 main.pdf]
Preview
Text
- Accepted Version

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Milcu, A., Puga-Freitas, R., Ellison, A. M., Blouin, M., Scheu, S., Freschet, G. T., Rose, L., Barot, S., Cesarz, S., Eisenhauer, N., Girin, T., Assandri, D., Bonkowski, M., Buchmann, N., Butenschoen, O., Devidal, S., Gleoxner, G., Gessler, A., Gigon, A., Greiner, A., Grignani, C., Hansart, A., Kayler, Z., Lange, M., Lata, J. C., Le Galliard, J. F., Lukac, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8535-6334, Mannerheim, N., Muller, M. E. H., Pando, A., Rotter, P., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Seyhun, R., Urban-Maed, K., Weigelt, A., Zavattaro, L. and Roy, J. (2018) Genotypic variability enhances the reproducibility of an ecological study. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2 (2). pp. 279-287. ISSN 2397-334X doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0434-x

Abstract/Summary

Many scientific disciplines are currently experiencing a “reproducibility crisis” because numerous scientific findings cannot be repeated consistently. A novel but controversial hypothesis postulates that stringent levels of environmental and biotic standardization in experimental studies reduces reproducibility by amplifying impacts of lab-specific environmental factors not accounted for in study designs. A corollary to this hypothesis is that a deliberate introduction of controlled systematic variability (CSV) in experimental designs may lead to increased reproducibility. We tested this hypothesis using a multi-laboratory microcosm study in which the same ecological experiment was repeated in 14 laboratories across Europe. Each laboratory introduced environmental and genotypic CSV within and among replicated microcosms established in either growth chambers (with stringent control of environmental conditions) or glasshouses (with more variable environmental conditions). The introduction of genotypic CSV led to lower among-laboratory variability in growth chambers, indicating increased reproducibility, but had no significant effect in glasshouses where reproducibility was generally lower. Environmental CSV had little effect on reproducibility. Although there are multiple causes for the “reproducibility crisis”, deliberately including genetic variation may be a simple solution for increasing the reproducibility of ecological studies performed in controlled environments.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/74258
Identification Number/DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0434-x
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Soil Research Centre
Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Publisher Nature
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar