On the interaction of observation and prior error correlations in data assimilation

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of paper_revised.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Fowler, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3650-3948, Dance, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-3338 and Waller, J. (2018) On the interaction of observation and prior error correlations in data assimilation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 144 (710). pp. 48-62. ISSN 1477-870X doi: 10.1002/qj.3183

Abstract/Summary

The importance of prior error correlations in data assimilation has long been known, however, observation error correlations have typically been neglected. Recent progress has been made in estimating and accounting for observation error correlations, allowing for the optimal use of denser observations. Given this progress, it is now timely to ask how prior and observation error correlations interact and how this affects the value of the observations in the analysis. Addressing this question is essential to understanding the optimal design of future observation networks for high-resolution numerical weather prediction. This paper presents new results which unify and advance upon previous studies on this topic. The interaction of the prior and observation error correlations is illustrated with a series of 2-variable experiments in which the mapping between the state and observed variables (the observation operator) is allowed to vary. In an optimal system, the reduction in the analysis error variance and spread of information is shown to be greatest when the observation and prior errors have complementary statistics. For example, in the case of direct observations, when the correlations between the observation and prior errors have opposite signs. This can be explained in terms of the relative uncertainty of the observations and prior on different spatial scales. The results from these simple 2-variable experiments are used to inform the optimal observation density for observations of a circular domain (with 32 grid points). It is found that dense observations are most beneficial when they provide a more accurate estimate of the state at smaller scales than the prior estimate. In the case of second order auto-regressive correlation functions, this is achieved when the lengthscales of the observation error correlations are greater than those of the prior estimate and the observations are direct measurements of the state variables.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/73172
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/qj.3183
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO)
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Royal Meteorological Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar