Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Processing polarity items: contrastive licensing costs

Full text not archived in this repository.
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Saddy, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-6076, Drenhaus, H. and Frisch, S. (2004) Processing polarity items: contrastive licensing costs. Brain and Language, 90 (1-3). pp. 495-502. ISSN 0093-934x doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00470-X

Abstract/Summary

We describe an experiment that investigated the failure to license polarity items in German using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The results reveal distinct processing reflexes associated with failure to license positive polarity items in comparison to failure to license negative polarity items. Failure to license both negative and positive polarity items elicited an N400 component reflecting semantic integration cost. Failure to license positive polarity items, however, also elicited a P600 component. The additional P600 in the positive polarity violations may reflect higher processing complexity associated with a negative operator. This difference between the two types of violation suggests that the processing of negative and positive polarity items does not involve identical mechanisms. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/72821
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Uncontrolled Keywords polarity; licensing; ERP; lexicon; integration; complexity
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar